Latest News


Media Releases

CPVV – Model Litigant??

Oct 27, 2020 | News, Parliament

Mr BARTON (Eastern Metropolitan) (18:25): My adjournment today is for the attention of the Minister for Public Transport, the Honourable Ben Carroll in the other place. It relates to a legal matter being pursued by an association known as the Victorian Taxi and Hire-Car Families, or the VTHF, against the regulator for the commercial passenger vehicle industry. The VTHF represents hundreds of ex taxi and hire-car licence owners who, as a result of the unlawful operation of rideshare prior to the reforms of 2017, sustained significant damages to their income as well as to the value of their private property—their taxi and hire-car licences.


It is claimed that this may have been due to the action and inaction of the regulator in exercising its statutory functions and obligations in relation to the monitoring and enforcement of licensing requirements by regulating the commercial passenger vehicle industry. Ultimately the industry reforms of 2017 culminated in the revocation of all licences for a fraction of their worth through a transition assistance scheme which provided an arbitrary monetary payment for some but not all licences. The legal matter before the courts is an application for preliminary discovery requesting that the regulator supply documents which may assist the VTHF to decide whether to institute proceedings against the regulator for damages incurred. This matter should simply have fallen within a freedom of information request. Instead the regulator has tied this up in the court for over three years, fighting tooth and nail against the families and small businesses of the commercial passenger vehicle industry who invested in their future through the purchase of taxi licences as part of conducting a lawful business and as part of their superannuation.

I have been contacted by a number of my constituents and industry stakeholders asking, ‘What are the documents that have been requested that the regulator wishes to hide? Why are they fighting so hard?’. Does the minister believe that vigorously defending these proceedings against taxi and hire-car families is the best use of taxpayer funds by the regulator? Therefore the action that I am asking the minister to take is: with the understanding of the model litigant rules and obligations for how the state and its agencies ought to behave as parties to litigation, will the minister ensure that the regulator acts with complete propriety, fairly and in accordance with the highest professional standards as would be expected of the behaviour of a model litigant?



Share this:

Related News

Uber’s Trojan Horse

Uber’s Trojan Horse

It gives me no pleasure to say to the Allan government, "I told you so," but I told you so! Will Wednesday, the 29th of November 2023, go down as the beginning of the end of competition in the taxi space in Victoria? We have seen time and time again seen Uber's...

This video highlights troubling corporate practices by Uber in the US

Caution: This video highlights troubling corporate practices by Uber in the US. It's vital to recognize that such behavior may extend to places like Australia. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) strong advocacy at a state and federal level backs the Albenese Labor...

Uber’s plan to destroy this industry has failed!

Uber’s plan to destroy this industry has failed!

After 10 years of facing a foreign taxi company that entered and operated in this country illegally, allowing them to gain a commercial advantage by underwriting the cost of delivering their service to effectively buy market share, government regulators turned a blind...